Key findings
Each finding carries its period and source. Section and table links lead to the full definitions.
- BHPH is a small share of auto credit but a large share of its stress. The Federal Reserve's BHPH proxy held about $32 billion in balances at Q3 2025, roughly 2% of all US auto balances and 5% of subprime auto balances. Table 1A [1]
- The segment grew much faster than traditional auto lending. BHPH proxy balances rose 214% from Q1 2018 to Q3 2025, against 34% for traditional auto loans over the same period. Both are cumulative nominal figures, not annual growth rates. [1]
- BHPH subprime loans carry a derived rate of 25.39%, against 14.60% for traditional subprime, in the Fed's Q1 2018 to Q3 2025 sample. The rate is imputed from principal, payment and term; it is not an observed contract APR. Table 1B [1]
- Distress is concentrated. At Q3 2025, 10.0% of BHPH proxy balances were delinquent against 3.8% for traditional loans, and about 5% were in active repossession against less than 0.5%. Table 1C [1]
- BHPH accounted for 9.97% of US auto financing in Q2 2026, by Experian's financing-source measure. That is a share of financing activity, not of outstanding balances or vehicle sales. [4]
- Subprime ABS delinquency rose to 6.13% in July 2026 on Fitch's revised index, up 33 basis points from June on the same basis. Table 4A [6]
- The largest public BHPH operator is under strain. America's Car-Mart reported FY2026 net charge-offs of 27.6% of average finance receivables, cut its store count from 154 to 94, and disclosed substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Table 1D [2] [3]
- Regulatory pressure is shifting to settlements. On 17 September 2026 New York's Attorney General announced a multistate Credit Acceptance settlement of about $700 million, while the FTC removed the vacated CARS Rule in February 2026. Section 7 [13] [14]
- New from TradeBasis: macro pressure on BHPH lending eased over the summer. The experimental TradeBasis USA BHPH Macro Conditions Index was 40.4 out of 100 in August 2026, down 14.2 points from May; higher scores mean more pressure. Funding was the highest-scoring pillar at 75.3. The index describes the national economic setting, not BHPH loan performance. Table 2A [17]
Quick answers
Short answers to the questions dealers, lenders and reporters ask most often about buy-here-pay-here lending. Each links to the table and source behind it.
How big is the buy-here-pay-here market in the United States?
The Federal Reserve's BHPH proxy held about $32 billion in outstanding balances at Q3 2025, roughly 2% of all US auto loan balances and about 5% of subprime auto balances. The figure is conservative because it can miss loans booked through dealers' related finance companies. By a different measure, Experian put BHPH at 9.97% of US auto financing in Q2 2026. Table 1A [1] [4]
Is buy-here-pay-here lending growing?
Yes. Balances in the Federal Reserve's BHPH proxy grew 214% from Q1 2018 to Q3 2025, compared with 34% for traditional auto loans over the same period. Both figures are cumulative nominal growth, not annual rates. Table 1A [1]
What interest rate do buy-here-pay-here loans carry?
In the Federal Reserve's sample of loans observed from Q1 2018 to Q3 2025, subprime BHPH loans carried a balance-weighted derived interest rate of 25.39%, compared with 14.60% for traditional subprime auto loans. The rate is imputed from principal, payment and term; it is not an observed contract APR or a 2026 origination average. Table 1B [1]
What are the average BHPH loan amount, payment and term?
For subprime BHPH loans in the Federal Reserve's Q1 2018 to Q3 2025 sample, the average origination principal was $15,402, the average monthly payment was $405 and the average term was 55 months. About 14% of those balances were on weekly or biweekly payment schedules. Table 1B [1]
What is the delinquency rate on buy-here-pay-here loans?
At Q3 2025, 10.0% of balances in the Federal Reserve's BHPH proxy were delinquent (more than 30 through 120 days past due), compared with 3.8% for traditional auto loans. Table 1C [1]
What is the default or charge-off rate for BHPH dealers?
There is no current industry-wide rate. The available reference points are: America's Car-Mart reported net charge-offs of 27.6% of average finance receivables for fiscal 2026; a historical Subprime Analytics composite averaged a 36.04% default (write-off) rate across 2018 to 2021; and the Federal Reserve found BHPH balances in default or charge-off status at 1.88 times the traditional rate at Q3 2025. These measure different things and should not be averaged. Table 1D Table 8A [1] [2] [8]
How much do BHPH customers put down?
America's Car-Mart reported an average down payment of 5.1% for fiscal 2026, which works out to roughly $1,023 on its $20,064 average retail price (a derived figure). The older NIADA 2021 composite reported an average cash down payment of $1,192. Neither is a current industry average. Table 5A Table 8A [2] [8]
How much gross profit does a BHPH dealer make per vehicle?
America's Car-Mart reported gross profit of $7,442 per retail unit and a 35.4% gross margin for fiscal 2026; the NIADA 2021 composite reported $6,981 per vehicle. Gross profit is measured before credit losses: Car-Mart's credit-loss provision equalled 40.8% of sales in the same year. Table 1D Table 8A [2] [8]
How common is repossession in buy-here-pay-here lending?
At Q3 2025, about 5% of balances in the Federal Reserve's BHPH proxy were in active repossession status, compared with less than 0.5% for traditional auto loans. That is a point-in-time share of balances, not the share of loans that are eventually repossessed. No reliable average time-to-repossession is established. Table 1C Section 7 [1]
Is the FTC CARS Rule still in effect?
No. The FTC removed the CARS Rule from the Code of Federal Regulations in a Federal Register notice dated 12 February 2026, after a federal court vacated it. Other federal and state consumer-protection requirements continue to apply. Section 7 [14]
What is the TradeBasis USA BHPH Macro Conditions Index?
It is an experimental monthly index, published by TradeBasis, that scores the national economic pressure around buy-here-pay-here lending from 0 to 100 using employment, household-budget and funding data. Higher scores mean more pressure. It read 40.4 in August 2026, down 14.2 points from May 2026. It describes the economic setting and is not a measure of BHPH loan performance. Table 2A Index page [17]
How to read this report
This report brings together public measurements of buy-here-pay-here (BHPH) lending, disclosed operator results and related auto-finance indicators, and adds an original TradeBasis index calculated from public economic data. It is built for practical reference and accurate quotation. Each benchmark belongs to a stated population and period; publication in 2026 does not make older observations 2026 data.
BHPH dealers sell vehicles and provide financing directly. Related finance companies, dealer subsidiaries and indirect lenders may be classified differently across datasets, so this edition keeps sector measurements, operator reference points and adjacent-market indicators separate.
| Category | What it establishes | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Sector measurement | A result for a defined BHPH proxy or financing category. | Coverage may exclude unreported loans or finance subsidiaries. |
| Operator reference | A named company's disclosed results. | An individual company is not an industry average. |
| Adjacent indicator | Conditions in broader auto credit, ABS or recovery activity. | Not specific to BHPH unless explicitly identified. |
| Historical reference | A dated composite, observation or forecast. | Do not quote as a current measurement. |
| TradeBasis index | An original index calculated by TradeBasis from public national data. | Describes the national economic setting, not BHPH loan performance. |
All dollar amounts are US dollars. Percentages keep the source's precision and definition. Figures are descriptive reference points, not operating targets or recommendations. Bracketed numbers link to the source list at the end of the report. This report is not a census of BHPH dealers; observation dates vary by metric.
1Benchmark tables
| Metric | Value and observation period | Population and source |
|---|---|---|
| BHPH proxy balances outstanding | Approximately $32 billion; Q3 2025 | Independent-auto-dealer-coded tradelines in NY Fed/Equifax CCP. Conservative coverage. [1] |
| BHPH proxy balance growth | 214%; Q1 2018 to Q3 2025 | Cumulative nominal balance growth; traditional-auto comparison 34%. Not annualized growth. [1] |
| Share of all auto balances | Approximately 2%; Q3 2025 | CCP BHPH proxy divided by total auto balances in that dataset. [1] |
| Share of subprime auto balances | Approximately 5%; Q3 2025 | CCP BHPH proxy within the subprime market. [1] |
| BHPH share of auto financing | 9.97%; Q2 2026 | Experian financing-source share; not the share of outstanding balances or all vehicle sales. [4] |
| BHPH/other financing share at independents | 32.6%; 2025 | NIADA combined BHPH/other category. Not a BHPH-only share and not a percentage of dealers. [5] |
| Deep-subprime share in Fed BHPH proxy | More than 50% in 2025; about 70% in 2018 | Fed borrower-mix discussion and balance chart. Equifax score below 580. [1] |
| Independent-dealer used sales | Approximately 9.8 million; 2025 | All independent-dealer used sales, including dealers that do not provide BHPH financing. [5] |
Comparability limits
The Fed, Experian and NIADA figures use different populations and denominators. A balance share measures an outstanding stock; a financing share measures activity in a period. Loan size, duration, reporting coverage and lender classification all affect the difference. These figures do not reconcile exactly and do not add up to a single market-size estimate.
The 214% and 34% figures compare cumulative growth over the same period. They do not establish a sixfold difference in annual growth rates, transaction counts or inflation-adjusted lending.
Source quality: [1] is primary regulatory research; [4] and [5] are public summaries published by the data providers. Strong provenance does not remove coverage or comparability limits.
| Metric | BHPH subprime | BHPH prime | Traditional subprime | Traditional prime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average origination principal | $15,402 | $19,340 | $17,424 | $21,122 |
| Average monthly payment | $405 | $394 | $350 | $368 |
| Average term in months | 55 | 62 | 64 | 61 |
| Balance-weighted derived interest rate | 25.39% | 11.81% | 14.60% | 5.65% |
| Weekly or biweekly share of balances | 14.43% | 7.42% | 0.67% | 0.38% |
| Share of balances within lender type | 77.52% | 22.48% | 26.94% | 73.06% |
Population: loans observed from Q1 2018 through Q3 2025; published 8 May 2026. Pooled historical-sample results, not 2026 origination averages. The rate is imputed from principal, payment and term, not an observed contract APR. Term information covers about 63% of the sample and payment frequency about 35%. Separate averages should not be combined into a representative amortization schedule. Federal Reserve Table 1. [1]
| Metric | BHPH and traditional comparison | Basis and limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Delinquent balance share | 10.0% versus 3.8%; Q3 2025 | Fed 30+ group: more than 30 through 120 days past due. Reported multiple 2.65 uses underlying precision. [1] |
| Default and charge-off status comparison | 1.88 times traditional; Q3 2025 | Snapshot status comparison; not annual defaults or a lifetime contract-default rate. [1] |
| Active repossession balance share | Approximately 5% versus less than 0.5%; Q3 2025 | Reported multiple 16.63. A status stock, not a count of repossessions during the quarter. [1] |
Credit-tier labels follow the source. These comparisons do not control for every difference in borrowers, vehicles or servicing policies, and do not establish causal effects of the BHPH model.
| Metric | Reported value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Average retail sales price | FY2026: $20,064 Q4 FY2026: $20,138 | Operator sales-price average; not a sector median. |
| Average down-payment percentage | FY2026: 5.1% Q4 FY2026: 6.1% Q1 FY2027: 5.4% | Periods must be kept. The 6.1% value is not the full-year average. |
| Approximate down-payment dollars | FY2026: $1,023 Q4 FY2026: $1,228 | Derived products of reported averages; not directly disclosed mean cash down payments. See Section 5. |
| Gross profit per retail unit | FY2026: $7,442 | Total gross profit divided by retail units; not cash collected or net profit. |
| Gross margin | FY2026: 35.4% | Company-reported gross margin; distinct from credit-loss provision and operating expenses. |
| Net charge-offs / average finance receivables | FY2026: 27.6% Q4 FY2026: 7.5% Q1 FY2027: 9.5% | Annual and quarterly measures; quarterly figures are not annualized here. |
| Credit-loss provision / sales | FY2026: 40.8% | Provision $419.23 million / sales $1,027.81 million. Not provision / total revenue. |
| Accounts over 30 days past due | 30 April 2026: 4.1% 31 July 2026: 4.6% | Account-based company metric; not the Fed's balance-weighted delinquency share. |
| Open dealerships | 30 April and 31 July 2026: 94 | Down from 154 at 30 April 2025. A store count, not an average over the year. |
Single-company results. FY2026 and Q4 FY2026 ended 30 April 2026; Q1 FY2027 ended 31 July 2026. Company-specific credit policies, customer mix, geography and funding conditions affect these results. Car-Mart disclosed liquidity constraints and a going-concern uncertainty in FY2026; its results are operator reference points, not an industry composite. Issuer releases [2] [3]
| Metric | Value and period | Population and source |
|---|---|---|
| Fitch subprime ABS 60+ delinquency | 6.13%; July 2026 | Revised Fitch index, reported through Auto Remarketing. Not BHPH-only. [6] [16] |
| Fitch subprime ABS annualized net loss | 8.42%; June 2026 | Revised index; annualized loss rate, not lifetime pool losses. [6] |
| Fitch subprime recovery index | 38.0%; July 2026 | Financial recovery measure for subprime ABS; not units recovered / assignments. [6] |
| Credit Acceptance 2022 vintage collections forecast | 59.3% at 30 June 2026; initial forecast 67.5% | Share of contractual repayments including principal and interest; not principal recovery or default frequency. [7] |
| RDN platform repossessions | 769,295 completed recoveries; Q3 2025 | Platform data reported by CURepossession; not BHPH-specific or a complete national census. [11] |
| RDN platform recovery ratio | 30.58%; Q3 2025 | Units recovered / reported unique assignments for the period. Not dollars recovered / loan balance. [11] |
| US auto balances | Approximately $1.71 trillion; Q2 2026 | New York Fed all-auto market, not BHPH balances. [10] |
| Flow into serious auto delinquency | 3.00% annualized; Q2 2026 | New York Fed transition into 90+ delinquency; not the share already delinquent. [10] |
Use of adjacent indicators
These measures give context for the lending and recovery environment. They cannot replace a BHPH dealer's own vintage losses, recovery proceeds or collections history. Securitized pools can differ from loans held by small independent operators.
Evidence basis: [6] and [11] are accessible secondary reporting of named datasets, and their figures keep that attribution. The presence of a primary publisher's name does not imply direct access to its full underlying dataset.
2TradeBasis USA BHPH Macro Conditions Index
The benchmarks in Section 1 describe BHPH loans. This section adds an original TradeBasis measure of the economic setting around them. The TradeBasis USA BHPH Macro Conditions Index scores national pressure on three fronts that matter to BHPH dealers and their customers: employment, household budgets and funding. Scores run from 0 to 100, and higher values indicate greater measured pressure. The index is experimental (version 1.0) and is calculated by TradeBasis from public BLS, US Department of Labor and Federal Reserve data. [17]
The composite fell from 54.6 in May to 40.4 in August 2026, a decline of 14.2 index points. August pillar scores were 23.1 for employment, 22.8 for household budgets and 75.3 for funding. Funding remained the highest-scoring pillar, although its score also declined. [17]
| Month | Composite | Employment | Household budget | Funding | 3-month change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | 44.5 | 36.5 | 15.0 | 82.1 | NA |
| Oct 2025 | NA | NA | NA | 81.8 | NA |
| Nov 2025 | NA | 37.4 | NA | 82.2 | NA |
| Dec 2025 | 42.4 | 30.7 | 14.4 | 81.9 | −2.2 |
| Jan 2026 | 41.6 | 29.6 | 13.3 | 81.9 | NA |
| Feb 2026 | 42.0 | 30.7 | 13.3 | 81.9 | NA |
| Mar 2026 | 46.4 | 29.6 | 27.8 | 81.9 | +4.1 |
| Apr 2026 | 49.4 | 25.3 | 41.1 | 81.9 | +7.8 |
| May 2026 | 54.6 | 29.6 | 53.9 | 80.3 | +12.6 |
| Jun 2026 | 45.3 | 28.5 | 27.2 | 80.3 | −1.1 |
| Jul 2026 | 42.9 | 26.8 | 21.7 | 80.3 | −6.5 |
| Aug 2026 | 40.4 | 23.1 | 22.8 | 75.3 | −14.2 |
Status: TradeBasis index, version 1.0-experimental, released 26 September 2026 UTC. Scores and changes are index points, rounded to one decimal. Three-month changes use exact calendar-month endpoints and are calculated before rounding. NA means unavailable, including changes whose earlier endpoint is missing or outside this table. The window holds 10 complete scores across 12 calendar months: October 2025 lacks the unemployment rate and five of the six basket price series following the federal shutdown, and November 2025 lacks the motor vehicle insurance CPI. Available pillars stay visible; missing inputs are not estimated and weights are not redistributed. [17]
Read this table alongside the report's credit benchmarks. It measures the national economic setting, not BHPH delinquency, dealer profitability or customer outcomes. A lower score alone does not establish improving loan performance. [17]
| Pillar and weight | Inputs | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Employment One third | Unemployment rate; monthly mean insured unemployment rate. | Higher unemployment inputs raise the score. Both are national employment proxies. |
| Household budget One third | Selected essential-price basket divided by nominal weekly earnings. | Higher essential costs relative to pay raise the score. It is not a measured household spending share. |
| Funding One third | Monthly prime rate; net bank tightening for small-firm commercial and industrial loans. | Higher rates or greater tightening raise the score. These are broad funding proxies. |
How the index is calculated
Each input is converted to a percentile against its own January 2010 to December 2024 history. The employment and funding pillars each average two input percentiles; the household-budget pillar uses the percentile of its cost-to-earnings ratio. The composite is the simple average of the three pillars. The essential-cost basket covers rent, food at home, fuels and utilities, gasoline, vehicle insurance and vehicle repairs, weighted by 2024 Consumer Expenditure Survey spending in the lowest two income quintiles. Every input, weight and formula is published, so the index can be reproduced. The full method, the basket weights, the monthly input values, a chart and the data files are on the index page. [17]
Appropriate use
Use the level, change and pillar mix to describe macro conditions alongside separately measured credit outcomes. The composite is an average of input percentiles, not itself a historical percentile or a probability of default. Fifty is not a validated neutral threshold. Equal pillar weights are an initial design choice; predictive accuracy against BHPH losses has not been established. National averages can also differ from a dealer's local labor market and customer mix. [17]
3Market coverage and borrower mix
What the public datasets cover
The Federal Reserve identifies independent-auto-dealer-coded loans in the NY Fed/Equifax Consumer Credit Panel as a proxy for BHPH lending. It can miss loans coded to finance companies, including subsidiaries of BHPH dealers. The reported $32 billion therefore describes the identified sample rather than a complete industry inventory. [1]
Experian's financing-source classification and NIADA's combined BHPH/other category answer different questions. NIADA's 32.6% share does not show that one-third of independent dealers offer BHPH financing, and "other" financing cannot be silently recategorized as BHPH. [4] [5]
| Structure | Illustrative names | Reference treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated retail and finance | America's Car-Mart; DriveTime and related finance entities | Company and securitization disclosures describe specific businesses or pools. |
| Franchised retail and finance | Byrider and CNAC-related operations | Franchise-level and local-dealer metrics need separate definitions. |
| Independent local dealer | Dealers financing vehicles directly or through related entities | Public coverage may be incomplete, especially where loans are not reported. |
| Indirect subprime lender | Credit Acceptance | Adjacent comparison; not a direct BHPH dealer. |
The Fed identifies DriveTime, Byrider and Car-Mart among its matched bank borrowers. The table classifies structures; it does not rank operators or state current store counts. [1] [2] [7]
Borrower mix
In the Fed's sample, the deep-subprime share fell from about 70% in 2018 to slightly above 50% in 2025. The historical Table 1 puts 77.52% of BHPH balances in its broader subprime grouping. These use different credit-group definitions and are not competing measurements. [1]
Changes in observed credit mix do not explain why customers entered BHPH financing or show that loan performance improved. This report supplies no sector borrower-income benchmark: dividing an average payment from one dataset by a payment-to-income ratio from another does not give a reliable estimate of average borrower income. The macro index's wage and spending inputs are also national proxies, not estimates of BHPH borrower income; see Table 2A. [17]
Independent dealer market context
NIADA reports about 9.8 million independent-dealer used-vehicle sales in 2025, within an estimated 38.6 million total used transactions. These are broader independent-retail figures, not BHPH sales volumes. [5]
4Credit performance and measurement
Fitch index revision
Fitch revised the inclusion method for its prime and subprime auto ABS indices from the July 2026 index and applied the change retrospectively. The values below come from one account of the revised series; earlier originally published values are not mixed in. [6] [16]
| Period | Prime 60+ delinquency | Subprime 60+ delinquency | Index basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| December 2025 | 0.54% | 6.50% | Revised history |
| June 2026 | 0.48% | 5.80% | Revised history |
| July 2026 | 0.49% | 6.13% | Revised index |
On this basis, subprime delinquency rose 0.33 percentage points (33 basis points) from June to July. An earlier comparison with 5.67% used a June figure on the old basis and should not be used for a continuous-series change. [6]
Credit Acceptance collection forecasts
| Vintage | Initial forecast | June 2026 forecast | Change, percentage points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 67.5% | 59.3% | −8.2 |
| 2023 | 67.5% | 62.9% | −4.6 |
| 2024 | 67.2% | 65.1% | −2.1 |
| 2025 | 67.0% | 66.9% | −0.1 |
| 2026 | 67.2% | 67.1% | −0.1 |
Origination-year cohorts; percentages of contractual repayments including principal and interest. Younger cohorts have had less time to season, so a smaller revision is not proof of a lower lifetime loss rate. The complement of a collection forecast is not a borrower-default percentage: the denominator includes contractual interest, and the issuer describes separate treatment of canceled loans. Issuer release [7]
Stocks, flows and losses
A delinquent balance share is a stock at a date. New delinquencies are a flow over a period. Annual net charge-offs use average receivables, while cumulative losses use an origination-pool denominator. Allowances are accounting estimates of expected losses, and provisions are period expenses. Comparisons must keep these distinctions.
The TradeBasis macro score is a separate contextual measure. Comparing its movement with credit data requires matching observation periods and allowing for loan seasoning; the series does not establish a causal link. [17]
5Deal and portfolio economics
Down payments and cash collected
Car-Mart reported a 5.1% average down-payment percentage for FY2026 and 6.1% for its fourth quarter. Multiplying these by the matching average retail prices gives about $1,023 and $1,228. These are scale illustrations derived from two averages, not directly observed mean cash down payments. [2]
| Period | Reported price | Reported down percentage | Derived product |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $20,064 | 5.1% | $1,023 |
| Q4 FY2026 | $20,138 | 6.1% | $1,228 |
Status: derived. A down payment is cash received at origination. Later principal and interest payments, recovery proceeds and other collections are tracked separately. Historical "cash in deal" or collected-cash measures do not support the claim that the down payment alone nearly recovers vehicle cost.
Gross profit and credit expenses
Car-Mart reported FY2026 gross profit per retail unit of $7,442, a 35.4% gross margin and a credit-loss provision equal to 40.8% of sales. These measures have different timing and denominators. Gross profit is not a prepaid cash loss reserve, and the provision-to-sales ratio is not a lifetime loss percentage. [2]
Comparing this operator's gross with franchise-dealer front-end gross requires reconciling ancillary revenue, accounting policy, credit expenses, overhead and financing. This report makes no claim that net profitability is higher or lower than conventional used-car retail.
Contract terms and collateral
The Fed's $15,402 average subprime BHPH principal and Car-Mart's $20,064 average retail price come from different populations and periods. Dividing one by the other does not give a typical financed share, loan-to-value ratio, down payment or markup. [1] [2]
Loan-to-value comparisons need the same collateral valuation basis: retail price, wholesale value and book value are not interchangeable. Payment-to-income comparisons need matching payment schedules and the same gross or net income definition.
In August 2026 the macro index's essential-cost and earnings indexes were 107.8 and 108.3, each based on its 2024 average of 100, giving a ratio of 99.5. This describes selected costs relative to average pay, not the share of a borrower's income available for a vehicle payment. [17]
Two numbers in every BHPH deal depend directly on vehicle value: the acquisition and reconditioning cost at the start, and the recovery value at the end if the vehicle is repossessed. A dealer's own loss and return figures are only as reliable as the valuation behind them. Valuing each unit against current comparable listings at acquisition and again at repossession gives a consistent basis for both. That is the work TradeBasis is built for.
Historical cash-on-cash returns
Car-Mart's September 2024 disclosure reports the pool returns below as of 31 July 2024. The FY2025 originations were largely outstanding when forecast. These are historical disclosures, not 2026 estimates. [9]
| Origination pool | Cumulative cash-on-cash return | Status at 31 July 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| FY2017 | 61.1% | Actual |
| FY2018 | 67.6% | Actual |
| FY2019 | 70.0% | Actual |
| FY2020 | 73.6% | Actual |
| FY2022 | 54.9% | Projected |
| FY2023 | 49.1% | Projected |
| FY2024 | 64.4% | Projected |
| FY2025 | 72.4% | Projected; 96.8% of A/R remaining |
The company defines the measure as (cash in − cash out) / cash out for a loan pool. Cash in includes payments and the fair market value of repossessed vehicles; cash out includes vehicle acquisition, reconditioning, transportation, post-sale expenses and ancillary-product expenses. These are cumulative pool returns, not annualized yields, IRRs or returns on equity, and should not be compared directly with an APR or annual portfolio yield. Valuing repossessed collateral at estimated fair value also differs from collecting sale proceeds in cash. [9]
What comparable dealer economics require
A dealer-level comparison should identify origination month, cash invested, timing of collections, defaults, net recovery proceeds, servicing costs, financing costs and shared overhead. A cumulative cash multiple alone does not describe payback time or peak capital required.
This edition does not establish a current industry-wide cash-on-cash or store-payback benchmark. Franchise aggregator estimates and values read approximately from chart axes are not presented as measured benchmarks.
6Funding and operator events
Bank financing in the Fed matched sample
These are facilities to dealer businesses, not consumer vehicle loans. The matching exercise covers identified large-bank exposures and is not a complete census of industry funding. [1]
| Measure | Reported value | Observation basis |
|---|---|---|
| Identified bank commitments | More than $2 billion | End 2025; 82 obligors, including subsidiary dealerships. |
| Fully guarantor-backed facilities | 81% BHPH versus 62% other dealers | Q3 2025; identified bank facilities. |
| Asset-based facilities | 65% BHPH versus roughly half for other dealers | Q3 2025; identified bank facilities. |
| Bank-assessed probability of default | Nearly 150% relative increase | Q2 to Q3 2025 for BHPH borrowers; not a 150-percentage-point increase. |
The Fed discusses structural protections, including guarantees, collateral and special-purpose entities, as possible explanations for bank risk ratings, and reports greater caution around the Tricolor bankruptcy. The evidence does not isolate that event as the sole cause of any lender's pricing or funding decision. [1]
The TradeBasis funding pillar measured 75.3 out of 100 in August 2026. Its inputs were a 6.75% monthly average prime rate and 1.8% net tightening for small-firm commercial and industrial loans, from the bank lending survey released 3 August 2026. These broader measures supplement the dated BHPH facility disclosures above; they do not measure dealer warehouse pricing or credit availability directly. [17]
America's Car-Mart funding and operations
Car-Mart's FY2026 release disclosed a need for additional financing and substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Its September 2026 release reported limited inventory and origination capacity, with retail units down 81.9% and revenue down 57.3% year over year for Q1 FY2027. These are company-specific disclosures, not industry growth rates. [2] [3]
Period-end finance receivables, net of allowance, were about $909.8 million at 31 July 2026. Gross principal balance and net carrying amount must be labeled separately whenever used. This report does not assume that a previously disclosed covenant-relief date remained the operative deadline after later amendments. [3]
Tricolor as an event reference
Tricolor's bankruptcy and the December 2025 federal charging announcement are relevant to collateral reporting and funding controls. The DOJ alleged fraudulent collateral practices. Allegations and charging status remain attributed; they do not establish how common similar conduct is among BHPH dealers. Trial dates, litigation outcomes and recovery forecasts need separate, current docket checks. [1] [15]
7Collections, repossession and regulation
Assignments, recoveries and proceeds are different measures
A repossession assignment is an instruction to recover a vehicle. A completed recovery is a recovered unit. Auction or resale proceeds are a dollar amount. A balance marked as repossessed is an account-status observation. These describe different stages and cannot substitute for one another.
| Measure | Value | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Unique reported assignments | 2,515,938 | Assignment activity; reporting describes deduplication by vehicle, with caveats about forwarding. |
| Completed repossessions | 769,295 | Reported platform recoveries in the quarter. |
| Recovery ratio | 30.58% | Quarterly completed recoveries / reported assignments, rounded. |
RDN data as published by CURepossession [11]. The article's prose calls the assignment total "second quarter," but its title, July to September component counts and discussion identify Q3: July 837,878 + August 821,755 + September 856,305 = 2,515,938. The ratio describes activity within the period and need not equal the eventual probability of recovering a newly assigned vehicle. RDN coverage is not a complete US or BHPH census.
Recovery value and elapsed time
The RDN unit-recovery ratio differs from Fitch's financial recovery index. Likewise, the Fed's approximately 5% active-repossession balance share is a point-in-time stock and cannot show how many days pass from the first missed payment to recovery. [1] [6] [11]
A widely repeated comparison of 30 days or less for BHPH against about 92 days for the wider market is not used here as a benchmark: its sources do not share a population, start date, endpoint or method. Dealer comparisons should state whether timing ends at assignment, physical recovery, sale or final cash receipt.
Historical research and resale
The CFPB's January 2025 repossession report is a useful primary research reference, with its own lender sample and observation window; comparisons with platform data need matching definitions. [12] Repeated resale examples do not establish an average recovery cycle or its profitability. Down payments, intervening payments, recovery costs and resale proceeds must stay distinct.
Regulatory context
This part records selected developments relevant to collections and vehicle finance. It is not a state-by-state statement of dealer obligations. Event dates, effective dates and the parties covered by an action should accompany any quotation.
Credit Acceptance settlement. On 17 September 2026 the New York Attorney General announced a multistate Credit Acceptance settlement described as about $700 million, including more than $630 million in debt relief, $60 million in restitution and $15.5 million in penalties. The amounts are rounded in the announcement and are not an independently reconciled total. For certain covered at-risk borrowers who default within 12 or 18 months and whose vehicles are repossessed and sold, the announcement describes forgiveness of 95% of the remaining debt, limits on collecting the balance, and restrictions on lawsuits or resale of that debt. These are settlement-specific conditions, not a general rule for BHPH loans. [13]
Federal CARS Rule. The FTC's 12 February 2026 Federal Register notice removes the CARS Rule from the Code of Federal Regulations following the court's vacatur. Its withdrawal does not mean other federal or state consumer-protection requirements have stopped applying. [14]
Supervision and device practices. Changes to supervisory thresholds should be identified as proposals or final rules and are not changes to all substantive legal obligations; withdrawing agency guidance is not repealing the underlying statute. The Fed notes GPS use by BHPH operators, but this edition does not establish a current national penetration rate for GPS or starter-interrupt devices; vendor subscriber counts include other customer types. Device restrictions, repossession procedures, notice requirements and rate limits depend on the applicable law and transaction. This edition does not reproduce state rate-cap tables or penalty schedules from vendor summaries. [1]
| Question | Appropriate answer form |
|---|---|
| Does a settlement apply to my dealership? | Identify the covered parties and loans before quoting an obligation. |
| Did federal withdrawal remove state requirements? | Assess each legal instrument separately; do not infer blanket deregulation. |
| What share of BHPH dealers use GPS or starter-interrupt devices? | No current representative percentage is established in this edition. |
Not legal advice. Dealers should confirm obligations with counsel in their state.
8Historical comparisons and outdated figures
Historical benchmarks stay useful when their original definitions and periods are kept. A later publication date, or a different operator's disclosure, does not automatically replace them. The 2021 Year in Review includes separate NIADA and NCM operating composites and loss metrics averaged across 2018 to 2021. [8]
| Measure | Historical value and population | Correct use |
|---|---|---|
| Average amount financed | $13,753; NIADA 2021 composite | Historical composite, not a current industry average. |
| Average cash down payment | $1,192; NIADA 2021 composite | Excludes trades and deferred down payments in the source definition. |
| Average contract term | 172 weeks; NIADA 2021 composite | Do not compare directly with a differently weighted multi-year sample without qualification. |
| Average gross profit per vehicle | $6,981; NIADA 2021 composite | One composite; the report also presents a separate NCM series. |
| Average net loss per charge-off | $6,365; Subprime Analytics 2018–2021 averages | Dollar loss per charged-off contract, not a percentage of the portfolio. |
| Average default rate | 36.04%; Subprime Analytics 2018–2021 averages | Source labels default as write-off. Not a standalone 2021 annual default measurement. |
Historical report [8], PDF pages 12–13. Its different contributors and averaging periods should stay visible when the numbers are quoted.
How to replace an outdated claim
For an undated "average APR around 20%," use the Fed's 25.39% derived historical-sample rate only with its Q1 2018 to Q3 2025 period and definition. The two figures do not show a measured 5.4-point increase in a consistent series.
For an undated down-payment amount, give a dated operator reference or a clearly identified historical composite; Car-Mart's derived dollar illustration is not a new industry mean. For "one-third of dealers offer financing," do not substitute NIADA's financing share, which has a different denominator.
Editorial practice: keep the historical value with its date, add a newer comparable measurement when one exists, and say when the newer source measures something different. Values that cannot be traced are omitted rather than relabeled as current.
9Methodology and updates
Evidence and classification
This report combines a secondary compilation by TradeBasis Research (Sections 1 and 3 to 8) with an original TradeBasis index (Section 2). Source entries distinguish primary research, issuer disclosures, accessible secondary reporting and derived indices. Each number is tied to a named source and an observation period. Source authority and population representativeness are assessed separately.
| Status | Meaning | Quotation rule |
|---|---|---|
| Reported | Published measurement or issuer disclosure | Keep population, period and denominator. |
| TradeBasis index | Original index calculated by TradeBasis from public inputs | Keep the index version, observation month and release date; credit TradeBasis. |
| Derived | Arithmetic performed on disclosed inputs | Keep the formula and limitations; do not call it directly measured. |
| Projected | An estimate of future collections or outcomes | Keep the forecast date and cohort; do not present as realized. |
| Historical | A dated reference kept for context | Keep the historical date even when the report is republished. |
| Not established | Evidence here does not support a defensible number | Do not fill the gap with another population's figure. |
Known gaps
This edition does not establish a current representative BHPH dealer count, borrower-income average, nationwide device-usage rate, time-to-repossession average, industry-wide net return or complete dealer P&L composite. No claim is made that this is the first free report or that all newer data elsewhere is paywalled.
Refresh schedule
TradeBasis Research reviews operator disclosures quarterly, ABS indices when updated, and industry composites when released. Data is replaced only after checking population and method. Forecast dates are preserved, and revisions to old observations are kept separate from newly observed periods. Legal status should be checked separately at the time of use.
The macro index is refreshed monthly using its versioned method. Baseline dates and weights stay fixed within a version, missing observations are kept, and revisions are archived. Cite the index version and release date. [17]
Revision record
3 October 2026, web edition. Published at tradebasis.net with plain-English key findings, per-table citations and the companion index page and data files.
25 September 2026. Added the TradeBasis USA BHPH Macro Conditions Index (Section 2), its method and source [17], with related context in Sections 3 to 6. Sector and operator benchmark values keep their prior observation periods.
22 September 2026. Corrected down-payment periods, cash-flow distinctions, unsupported inferences, mixed-basis Fitch comparisons and historical loss periods.
21 September 2026. First edition.
Sources
Primary and secondary evidence are labeled. Sources [1] to [16] were accessed on 22 September 2026. Source [17] uses inputs retrieved on 26 September 2026 UTC. Observation, retrieval and publication dates are kept separate.
- [1]Federal Reserve Board. Subprime Auto Lending Trends in Buy Here Pay Here Auto Lending. FEDS Notes, 8 May 2026.
Primary research; CCP consumer loans and Y-14Q bank facilities. Table 1 covers Q1 2018 to Q3 2025.
federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/subprime-auto-lending-trends-in-buy-here-pay-here-auto-lending-20260508.html - [2]America's Car-Mart. Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2026 Results. 14 July 2026.
Primary issuer disclosure; fiscal year and quarter ended 30 April 2026.
ir.car-mart.com, Q4 and FY2026 results - [3]America's Car-Mart. First Quarter Fiscal Year 2027 Results. 9 September 2026.
Primary issuer disclosure; quarter ended 31 July 2026. Fiscal 2027 is not calendar 2027.
ir.car-mart.com, Q1 FY2027 results - [4]Experian. Auto Loan Rates and Financing for 2026. Accessed 22 September 2026.
Publisher's public summary of Q2 2026 automotive finance data; includes BHPH financing share.
experian.com/blogs/ask-experian/auto-loan-rates-financing - [5]NIADA. UCIR Shows Independent Used Sales Top 9.8 Million in 2025. March 2026.
Primary public summary of UCIR 2025; preserves the combined BHPH/other category.
niada.com, UCIR 2025 summary - [6]Auto Remarketing, reporting Fitch Ratings. Fitch Watches Tax Refund Boost on Securitizations Fade During Half of the Year. 24 August 2026.
Secondary account of Fitch's 19 August 2026 monitor. Revised historical index basis; not a BHPH-only series.
autoremarketing.com, Fitch securitization coverage - [7]Credit Acceptance, via GlobeNewswire. Second Quarter 2026 Results. 4 August 2026.
Primary issuer release; collection forecasts as of 30 June 2026. Contractual repayments include principal and interest.
globenewswire.com, Credit Acceptance Q2 2026 - [8]NABD, NIADA, SGC CPAs and contributors. BHPH Benchmarks: Market Perspectives and Trends, 2021 Year in Review. June 2022.
Historical industry report. PDF page 12 contains separate NIADA and NCM operating composites; page 13 states loss metrics use 2018–2021 averages.
sgcaccounting.com/Resources/BHPHBenchmarks2021.pdf - [9]America's Car-Mart, SEC exhibit. Q1 Fiscal 2025 Results and Cash on Cash Returns. 4 September 2024.
Primary historical issuer disclosure; pool estimates as of 31 July 2024, not current forecasts.
sec.gov, Car-Mart exhibit 99.1 - [10]Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Household Debt Balances Decreased Slightly. 11 August 2026.
Primary Q2 2026 household-credit release; auto balances and annualized transitions into serious delinquency.
newyorkfed.org/newsevents/news/research/2026/20260811 - [11]CURepossession, reporting RDN. RDN Repossession Volume Report Q3 2025. 2025; accessed 22 September 2026.
Secondary publication of RDN platform data. Distinguishes assignments, completed recoveries and publisher projections.
curepossession.com/rdn-repossession-volume-report-q3-2025 - [12]Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Repossession in Auto Finance. January 2025.
Primary research; lender sample and study period must accompany any extracted benchmark.
consumerfinance.gov, Repossession in Auto Finance (PDF) - [13]New York Attorney General. Credit Acceptance Multistate Settlement Announcement. 17 September 2026.
Primary announcement. Relief and restrictions concern covered Credit Acceptance loans; not a general BHPH rule.
ag.ny.gov, Credit Acceptance settlement - [14]Federal Trade Commission, Federal Register. Revision and Withdrawal of Rules to Conform to Federal Court Decisions. 12 February 2026. 91 FR 6507.
Primary rulemaking notice; includes removal of the CARS Rule after vacatur.
federalregister.gov, 2026-02866 - [15]US Department of Justice, SDNY. CEO, CFO, COO Charged in Connection with Collapse of Tricolor Auto. 17 December 2025.
Primary historical charging announcement. Allegations are not findings of guilt.
justice.gov, Tricolor charging announcement - [16]Fitch Ratings. North American Auto ABS Monitor 1H26. 19 August 2026.
Underlying rating-agency publication; the figures in this report are sourced through accessible coverage [6].
fitchratings.com, Auto ABS Monitor 1H26 - [17]TradeBasis. TradeBasis USA BHPH Macro Conditions Index. Version 1.0-experimental. September 2025 to August 2026. Released 26 September 2026 UTC.
Original derived index using public BLS, US Department of Labor and Federal Reserve data, including FRED-distributed series. Equal-weight national macro pillars; latest-revised retrospective history. Ten complete monthly scores; October and November 2025 are unavailable where required inputs were not published. All source observations, basket weights, formulas and the source list are published as companion CSV files so the index can be reproduced.
tradebasis.net/research/bhph-macro-index Index CSV JSON Methodology Source data Basket weights Source list
How to cite this report
This report is free to read, quote and reuse with attribution to TradeBasis under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Figures from third-party sources remain the work of those sources; please credit both.
Full citation
TradeBasis Research. (2026). BHPH Economics and Portfolio Benchmarks, 2026 Edition (updated 3 October 2026). Basis Software Inc. https://tradebasis.net/research/bhph-benchmarks
Short form
Source: TradeBasis, BHPH Economics and Portfolio Benchmarks 2026
Single figure
Metric, value; population; observation period; status (reported, TradeBasis index, derived or projected); original source and date; via TradeBasis, BHPH Economics and Portfolio Benchmarks 2026, tradebasis.net/research/bhph-benchmarks.
Example
Derived interest rate, 25.39%; subprime loans in the Fed BHPH proxy; observations Q1 2018 to Q3 2025; balance-weighted imputed rate; Federal Reserve, 8 May 2026; via TradeBasis, BHPH Economics and Portfolio Benchmarks 2026. Not a 2026 origination APR.
About TradeBasis
TradeBasis is independent used-vehicle appraisal and market intelligence software for US franchised and independent dealers, built by an operator with 20 years in automotive retail. It values vehicles against live US dealer listings rather than lagging guide-book averages, matches comparables by trim, shows every comparable listing so appraisers can see and exclude outliers, and adjusts for mileage and days on market.
TradeBasis Research publishes free reference data for the dealer community, including the monthly BHPH Macro Conditions Index. TradeBasis is a product of Basis Software Inc. and is not affiliated with Cox Automotive, CDK Global, any OEM or any auction house.
Lite is $99 per month for one user; Pro is $249 per month for up to 10 users. Month-to-month, with no contracts or setup fees.
Compare Lite and Pro